Student Demographics
Top
The student population that
matriculated into Higher Ground Academy during the course of
the 2005-2006 academic year fluctuated between 402 students
at the beginning of the year and 441 students by the middle
of March 2006. This number fluctuated during the course of
the year at different grade levels. By the end of the school
year we finished with a population of 438 students. Although
there would be some variations in some sections of student
enrollment, most of the data for the total number of
students’ enrollment in the subsequent sections would
reflect the 438 students we finished with by the end of the
school year.
Student Demographic: Enrollment, average
class
Top
size and teacher-student ratio
Despite the significant number of
students who transferred in and out of Higher Ground Academy
during the school year 2005-2006, enrollment fluctuated. We
started the school year with a sharp decline in enrollment.
We attribute the decline in enrollment that was observed at
the beginning of the school year to the bad publicity
resulting from a highly unfavorable review by our previous
sponsor, the Saint Paul Public School District. We finished
the previous year with an enrollment of 441 students. At the
start of the 2005-2006 school year, we only had 402 students
enrolled. Enrollment continued to increase during the school
year reaching the peak in March 2006 with 441 students.
Higher Ground Academy had two
classrooms per grade for Kindergarten through 4th
grade. The other classes, 5th, 6th, 7th,
and 8th, had single class enrollments with one
middle level and one high school ELL. We had three combined
high school level, 9th/10th, 10th/11th,
and 11th/12th classrooms.
The average classroom size remained
fairly constant with a ratio of 23 students per teacher. The
table below shows a break down of the school’s profile of
the year in operation, by enrollment, class size and teacher
to student ratio per grade level.
Table 1 – Enrollment, Average Class
Size, Teacher to Student Ratio for year 6
|
SCHOOL
YEAR 2005-2006 |
|
|
Grades K-3 |
Grades 4-6 |
Grades 7-12 |
|
Enrollment |
181 |
76 |
181 |
|
Average Class Size |
23 |
19 |
23 |
|
Teacher/Student Ratio |
1:23 |
1:19 |
1:23 |
Student
demographics: Race
Top
The 2005-2006 profile of the school
with regard to race is broken down in table 2a below by
grade level. Categories include Whites, Blacks, Hispanics,
Native Americans and Asians.
Table 2a - Student Demographics by Race
and Grade Level Clusters
|
Student
Population by Race |
|
Grade Level |
Caucasians |
African Americans |
Hispanics |
Native American |
Asians |
|
K-3 |
0 |
181 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
4-6 |
0 |
76 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
7-12 |
1 |
179 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
Table 2b - Student demographics by
National Origin and Grade Level Clusters
|
Grade Level |
Somalis |
Americans |
Oromos |
Hmongs |
|
K-3 |
141 |
16 |
24 |
0 |
|
4-6 |
45 |
19 |
12 |
0 |
|
7-12 |
127 |
33 |
21 |
2 |
Student demographic: Title 1 (Free and
Reduced lunch)
Top
90.2% of the students who attended
Higher Ground Academy during the school year 2005-2006
received free /reduced lunch. Table 3 below presents the
total number and the percentages of students who either
received or did not receive free and reduced lunch during
the school year in operation. The student turnover, which
was related to this student characteristic, is not factored
in the representation.
Table 3 Title 1 and Non-Title 1 Student
and Percentages.
|
2005-2006 |
|
School Totals |
Title 1 Students |
Non-Title 1 Students |
Total |
|
Number |
395 |
43 |
438 |
|
Percentage (%) |
90.2% |
9.8% |
100% |
Table 4a shows the total number of
students, number of those receiving free and reduced
educational benefits by grade level.
Table 4a Free and Reduced Educational
Benefits by Grade in 2005-2006
Grade
|
Total Enrollment |
Total Free & Reduced
|
Percentage |
|
K |
59 |
54 |
91.5% |
|
1 |
49 |
47 |
95.9% |
|
2 |
38 |
33 |
86.8% |
|
3 |
35 |
32 |
91.4% |
|
4 |
30 |
26 |
86.6% |
|
5 |
28 |
27 |
96.4% |
|
6 |
18 |
15 |
883.3% |
|
7 |
29 |
25 |
86.2% |
|
8 |
28 |
25 |
89.3% |
|
9 |
64 |
59 |
92.2% |
|
10 |
22 |
20 |
90.9% |
|
11 |
16 |
14 |
87.5% |
|
12 |
22 |
19 |
86.4% |
|
TOTAL |
438 |
396 |
90.2% |
Further analysis on all grade levels
indicates that students between K-3 grade levels had the
highest percentage of free and reduced lunch in regards to
the total enrollment. The lowest percentage of free and
reduced lunch came from the upper grade students i.e. 7-12
grade level. Again it should be noted that there would be
variations in the numbers due to the fluctuating enrollment
experienced in the course of the year.
Table 4b Percentage of Students
receiving FREE/REDUCED Education Benefits by Grade Level
Clusters
Grade Level
|
Total Enrollment |
Total Title 1
|
% Receiving Title 1 |
K-3
|
181 |
166 |
91.7% |
|
4-6 |
76 |
66 |
89.5% |
|
7-12 |
181 |
162 |
89.5% |
It is noteworthy that a little over
90% of the student population at Higher Ground Academy
received free and reduced lunch. As a salient indicator of
students’ background, this finding had varied impact on the
academic and administrative management of the school during
the ending sixth year of operation.
Student Demographics:
Student Turnover
Top
During the course of the school year
2005-2006, a total of 158 students transferred out of the
school. This was a significant increase compared to the
previous year where we had only 90 students transferring out
during the course of the year. We however, attribute the
situation to the strained relationship resulting from bad
publicity we had with our former sponsor.
Table 5 – Student Turnover Rates
by Semester and Grade level Clusters
|
Grades |
Students Who Left in the First Semester |
Students Who Left in the Second Semester |
K-3
|
30 |
16 |
|
4-6 |
22 |
9 |
|
7-12 |
53 |
28 |
Student demographics: Special
Education
Higher Ground Academy’s student
demographics with regard to Special Education indicate a
total of 36 students. In the elementary (4th-6th
grade), 17 students received services and 19 students
received services in the 7th – 12th
grade.
Specifically, 3 students had Emotional
and Behavioral Disorders (EBD) in the school. Eighteen (18)
students had Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) and three
(2) students
with Other Health Disabilities (OHD).
Eight (8) students had Developmental Cognitive Disabilities
(DCD) and four students (4) were Speech/Language impaired
and one student with deaf and hard of hearing.
Table 6 represents the number of
students in each category of disability school wide.
|
Type of Disability |
|
LEVEL |
EBD |
SLD |
OHD |
DCD |
SP/Lang |
Deaf/Hard of Hearing |
|
K-6 |
1 |
9 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
7-12 |
2 |
9 |
2 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
KEY
EBD
= Emotional/Behavioral Disorder
Top
SLD = Specific Learning disability
OHD = Other Health Disabilities
DCD = developmental Cognitive
Disabilities
SP/Lang = Speech & Language
Student demographics: English
Proficiency/ESL
Of the 438 students who attended
Higher Ground Academy in the 2005/2006 school year, 313
(71.5%) were Somalis, and 57 (13%) were Oromos. These two
groups gave a total of 370 (84.5%) of the entire student
population. Out of the 313 Somalis, 134 or 81.7% had limited
English proficiency and out of the 57 Oromos, 30 (53%) also
had limited English proficiency. The total number of
students and percentage that had limited English proficiency
during the year in operation Somalis and Oromos combined
stood at 164 or 37.4%. Table 7 below breaks down the number
of students with limited English proficiency by grade level
clusters.
Table 7 – Limited English
Proficiency
|
Grade Level |
Number of LEP/ESL Students |
|
K-3 |
42 |
|
4-6 |
18 |
|
7-12 |
104 |
|
Overall School Total |
164 |
LEP/ESL Program. The Multi-Age Classroom
Top
During the school year 2005-2006,
Higher Ground Academy had an all day ESL class for
elementary students grades 1-5 with a fully licensed ESL
instructor. There were 16 ESL students in the elementary
with no English background and these were put in a multi-age
ESL classroom. Other students who had some English Language
background had a pull out mode of ESL instruction.
The secondary students whose English
Language background was limited had a bilingual program
taught by bilingual instructors. Higher Ground Academy had
one bilingual classroom at the middle school level and
another at the high school level. Higher Ground Academy had
43 middle and high school age LEP students who were either
Somalis or Oromos. The students were organized into two
groups based on their level of performance on pretest
administered by the school at the beginning of the school
year. Group 1 comprised of those students who had some
English language exposure and group 2 for new immigrants who
were new to the country and the English language. Bilingual
teachers instructed both groups. Curriculum for group 1 was
reading, writing and mathematics while group 2 had bilingual
science and bilingual social studies in addition to reading,
writing and mathematics. Some students in group 2 had some
background in mathematics and science but had limited
proficiency in the English language.
The remaining one hundred and thirty
one (131) students with limited English proficiency, all of
whom were of East African decent, received service in the
mainstream classroom with the “inclusion” model. Some of
those students had lived in the United States for three
years or more and still exhibited limited proficiency in the
English language.
Student Participation
Top
This section will report on the
Academy’s student information on attendance and mobility.
Student Participation:
Attendance
Higher Ground Academy students attended
school most of the time during its sixth year of operation.
The mean average of attendance for female students from K-12
was 96.45%, a 0.61% increase from the year before. The mean
average attendance for male students from K-12 was 96.73%,
an increase of 1.16% in attendance. There was more or less
the same rate of increase for male and female students in
the reporting year. Both the male and female attendance
increased slightly in the year in operation. The number of
excused absences for female students went down from 45% to
33.7% and unexcused absence went up from 55% to 66.3%. A
similar improvement in attendance was observed with the male
students. Excused absences for male students went down from
36% to a significant 33.5% while unexcused absence went up
to 66.5%.
Given the importance of attendance on
overall learning and student performance, time and analyses
will be invested into the section following. To tease out
insights and highlights, the analyses will use grade and
gender comparisons.
Analyzed by grade level and gender, 4th
grade male students had the highest attendance (97.63%),
followed by second (2nd) and third (3rd)
grade male students (97.54%) for both groups. The female
attendance could be ranked in the following order: 10th
grade (97.48%) in first position, followed by 3rd
grade (97.16%) and 7th grade (97.07%). Eleventh
(11th) grade females had the lowest attendance
rate (93.38%) proceeded by twelfth (12th) grade
males (94.72%).
It was noticed that unexcused absence
was far greater than excused absence school wide, K-12.
Kindergarten female students had the highest excused
absences (64%) followed by kindergarten males (58%) and 9th
grade females (44.9%) coming in third position.
Incidentally, 12th grade females had the highest
rate of unexcused absence (100%). All absences were
unexcused. Tenth (10th) grade females also
exhibited a high incidence of unexcused absences (88.2%)
followed by 2nd grade males (87.5%) and 3rd
grade females (86.7%). Gender wise, female students had the
highest unexcused absences (79.3%) as opposed to male
students unexcused absences registered at 76.8%.
School wide, female students registered
the highest attendance rate in the following four grade
levels (7th, 8th, 9th, and
10th), while male students registered their
highest attendance rate in the following nine grade levels,
(K, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th,
5th, 6th, 11th, and 12th).
The average percentage rate for female students’ attendance
through the four grades mentioned above is 96.8%, while that
of the males through the nine grades mentioned is 96.84%.
School wide, male students registered a high rate of excused
absences in 7 out of 13 grade levels. These were 2nd,
3rd, 4th, 6th, 8th,
10th and 12th grades. Kindergarten:
(65/58), 1st grade (41.2/31), 2nd
grade (44.4/32.3) 3rd grade (41.7/32.6), 4th
grade (43.6/39.6) 5th grade (65.1/33.8), 6th
grade (41.6/29) 7th grade (45.3/34.9), 9th
grade (44.9/38.5), 10th grade (34.9/29.1), 11th
grade (38.9/17.8) and 12th grade (36.3/29.2),
{M/F}.
There was a significant difference in
male/female attendance in the following grade levels: 2nd
grade (26.9/23.5), 3rd grade (40.4/34.9), 4th
grade (35.1/24.8), 8th grade (56.7/32.2), 10th
grade (41.6/38.5), and 12th grade (38.3/33.0).
Table 8a presents attendance
percentages by grade and gender for K-12 students, including
the total averages for each gender. The table also portrays
both excused and unexcused absences by grade and gender
school wide, with total averages for each gender.
Table 8a – Attendance Percentages by
Grade and Gender
|
|
|
Member |
Attendance |
Absences |
Excused |
Unexcused |
|
Grade |
Sex |
|
|
|
|
|
|
KA |
Male |
100 |
96.16 |
100 |
32.2 |
67.8 |
|
|
Female |
100 |
94.92 |
100 |
33.9 |
66.1 |
|
1st |
Male |
100 |
96.54 |
100 |
26.5 |
73.5 |
|
|
Female |
100 |
95.48 |
100 |
31.5 |
68.5 |
|
2nd |
Male |
100 |
97.54 |
100 |
26.9 |
73.1 |
|
|
Female |
100 |
96.28 |
100 |
23.5 |
76.5 |
|
3rd |
Male |
100 |
97.54 |
100 |
40.4 |
59.6 |
|
|
Female |
100 |
97.16 |
100 |
34.9 |
65.1 |
|
4th |
Male |
100 |
97.63 |
100 |
35.1 |
64.9 |
|
|
Female |
100 |
96.37 |
100 |
24.8 |
75.2 |
|
5th |
Male |
100 |
96.81 |
100 |
30.9 |
69.1 |
|
|
Female |
100 |
96.38 |
100 |
49.2 |
50.8 |
|
6th |
Male |
100 |
97.02 |
100 |
31.1 |
68.9 |
|
|
Female |
100 |
96.38 |
100 |
30.1 |
69.9 |
|
7th |
Male |
100 |
97.04 |
100 |
13.0 |
87.0 |
|
|
Female |
100 |
97.07 |
100 |
29.1 |
70.9 |
|
8th |
Male |
100 |
95.16 |
100 |
56.7 |
43.3 |
|
|
Female |
100 |
96.02 |
100 |
32.2 |
67.8 |
|
9th |
Male |
100 |
96.79 |
100 |
32.0 |
68.0 |
| |